An employed paralegal recently offered the advice to “hang out at the court” as a way to get exposure to both lawyers and court proceedings. So, one recent Wednesday morning, dressed up with jacket & tie and trekked out to the Oakland County complex, where the Sixth Circuit court operates.
Visiting various court building was a major part the OCC
Paralegal program, so I knew that anything with a camera is strictly forbidden
(ex. Phone, computers, etc…). Once inside the building it was hard to know
which courtroom to choose out of, at least, the three floors. The choice ended up being the second floor
and I walked into the first courtroom after getting off the elevators.
The judge and her clerks were sitting at the front of the
courtroom. When I walked in both plaintiff and defense tables were fully occupied
and they were just getting started. It was amazing the speed with which these
motions are dealt. There were a half dozen or so, but these were some of the more
interesting.
This was a summary disposition motion being brought by
everyone. Plaintiff was an insurance company seeking pro-rata payments from 5
defendants for a claim they had to pay involving a motorcycle / automobile
accident. The plaintiff claimed that the
defendants represented 5 individuals who were “involved” in the accident. The
Defendants all asserted that they were not actively involved in causing the
accident. The short version is that the 5 defendants were stopped on the
freeway due to construction when the automobile and motorcycle collided behind
and then struck them. After everyone made their argument the judge read her
opinion (granting the defense motions for summary judgment and denying the
plaintiff’s) into the record.
Later there were motions in a cross-complaint. Pizza
Restaurant “A” was being sued for payment by Supplier. Pizza Restaurant “A”
then sues Pizza Restaurant “B” alleging that “B” pressured Supplier to sever
their relationship. The oral arguments for summary disposition from Restauran B
included, but were not limited to, claims that Restaurant “A” didn’t respond in
timely fashion, didn’t respond completely, and that a sound business reason is
a complete defense to a “tortuous interference with a business relationship”
claim. Arguments from Restaurant A included, but were not limited to, that the allegation
didn’t cover just illegal actions but also improper motives which was indicated
because Restaurant A targeted the suppliers relationship with Restaurant B. The
judge picked up and read her ruling into the record: Granting summary judgment
for the 3rd Party Defendant.
After a motion to adjourn the scheduled dates for 60 days on
a mortgage forgery case, one of the attorneys stood to make a motion to admit a
lawyer to the bar. Reciting an impressive biography of scholastic, extra-circular,
and community achievements the other attorney concurred with the motion. The
judge called the new lawyer to the bench, stood and applied the oath to the new
lawyer. According to one source, this was not a unique event but was a special
one to witness!
Divorce Judgment: “What Can I Do For You”
After the last civil case motion was heard I meandered down
the hall to another courtroom that happened to be hearing family / divorce
motions. This was more interesting because the judge was more inquisitive of
the parties appearing in front of her, which were usually the actual individuals
whose lives would be impacted by her rulings.
The first motion was involving
an ongoing custody situation where a young father was trying to get visitation
with his son. The judge said that he was doing everything right and to keep it
up.
But there was one issue that stuck out. The defendant’s
attorney got up and started recounting the procedural history of the case
stretching back to 2001 (“seven attorneys and four judges…”). Then he talked
about the divorce judgment entered in 2001. The plaintiffs attorney talked
about the dire condition of her client. The defendant talked about how his
client had gone from a partner in a successful business to nearly broke today.
Throughout, the judge pointed out that she didn’t have the ability to change the
judgment of divorce and that neither party was in a particularly unique
situations (“I’ve seen so many people in your position I could start a support
group”).
“What can I do for you?” She would ask. The lawyers would
then continue on their rants. Eventually, though a lot of back and forth in
this way, the claim came out from one side that he still owed a couple hundred thousand
dollars and his side was that he lacked the ability to pay it. So the final judgment
was to schedule discovery and come back in 90 days, or so, and see what could
be worked out.
All in all, the county circuit court was both interesting
and informative. Taking the time and effort to go out and watch it in action is
a good idea. If possible, becoming a regular there would also be a good idea
for making initial and ongoing contacts. Can’t hurt to know court personnel,
either. Maybe another good idea would be to check out the local district court,
as it’s closer and easier to access.
No comments:
Post a Comment